Skip to main content

Table 2 3D in vitro models of CAVD

From: Models for calcific aortic valve disease in vivo and in vitro

Classification

Type

Molding methods

Results

Advantages

Disadvantages

Ex vivo

valve leaflets (Weber et al. 2021)

AV leaflets from healthy 6–9 months Ovis; stretched with needles on silicon rubber rings; under pro-degenerative conditions for 14d-56d

At 14 d begins to form and at 56 d massive calcium accumulation in three layers by histologic staining; Col1A1, Col3A1, VIM, ACTA-2, OPN↑

easily applicable, reproducible, and cost effective; native valvular ECM and realistic VIC–VEC interactions

processed cultured under passive tension; regardless of cell types and factors in the blood circulation

perfusion heart ( Kruithof et al. 2021)

whole mouse hearts (2–6 months) in MTCS; perfusion with osteogenic medium (OSM) or inorganic phosphates + Dex for 1 weeks

PI + Dex but not OSM induces valve leaflets calcification indicated by alizarin red-stainning; ALP and RUNX1/2/3 immunostaining; Endochondral differentiation staining

culture of mouse valves in their natural position in the heart and under specific hemodynamic conditions; exposing the leaflets to pro-calcific enviroment (relative native); shorten culture time

retrograde flow created a mechanical environment favoring calcification; regardless of cell types and factors in the blood circulation

Hydrogel-based 3D culture

Scaffold-based coculture (Hof et al. 2016)

Sheep aortic valves were decellularized and treated with trypsin or laser perforation, then reseeded with sheep VICs

low activation of repopulating VIC after 7 days of culture;MMP2,MMP9,αSMA↑

using fsL-mediated photodisruption to increase dECM permeability; short enzymatic treatment facilitate the migration of seeded VIC into the ECM

Not for CAVD modeling; Relatively limited interstital repopulation; hard to identify exact photodisrupted regions

Scaffold-based coculture (Stadelmann et al. 2022)

A bilayer cryo-electrostatically spun scaffold, 6-y porcine VEC and VIC seeded onto FN-functionalized scaffold, cultured for 4 weeks in CM or OM

cell adherence, homogenous migration and proliferation↑; VICs interact with VECs↑;

Runx2,SPP1↑;

a promising platform material to study calcification on a soft substrate;

could be integrated into perfusion or dynamic culture systems for studying disease progression

3D stacked paper-based culture (Sapp et al. 2015)

6-m pVICs, filter paper layer printed with a wax-well plate template, implanted with a mixture of VICs and collagen

VIC migration↑; αSMA↑

Allows customization of the ECM and incorporates the ability to stack individual layers to control the thickness of the total culture

the position of cells in each layer cannot be controlled

Hydrogel-based culture plateform (Porras et al. 2018)

pVICs seeded on either GelMA only or GelMA/GAG hydrogels (HA, CS), treated with 25 μg/mL human LDL or oxLDL for 72 h

GAGs enriched ECM leads to inflammatory↓, angiogenesis↑, deposition of oxidized lipoproteins↑

mimics enriched GAGs, quiescent VICs, and presence of lipoproteins in early CAVD

It does not include studies of the factors that regulate the onset of GAG enrichment or the importance of early features in fibrosis and calcification

Micropatterning hydrogel based plateform (Duan et al. 2019)

12-year(Normal) or 75-y(CAVD) individual origin HAVIC were seeded on 3D micropatterned bioactive hydrogels consisting of Me-HA/Me-Gel, with a customized mask-guided photocrosslinking method;in OGM

αSMA↑, MMP-1↑, ALP↑; osteogenic differentiation↑in diseased HAVIC with patterning,

bioactive Me-HA/Me-Gel hydrogels with VIC

ECM-like components and similar stiffness to the ventricularis and fibrosa layers of aortic heart valve leaflets

The width and space of the micropattern, and different degrees of alignment, were not studied

Bioreactor model (Gould et al. 2012)

compression springs with gel inoculation, solidified for 60 min and seeded with porcine valve mesenchymal stromal cells

proliferation and apoptosis↑;

F-actin↑;

ACTA2↑

Implemented a novel bioreactor to investigate the relationship between anisotropic strain, cell differentiation, and matrix remodeling in 3D culture

It is unclear how cells interpret time- and direction-varying anisotropic strain fields in defined three-dimensional matrix structures

Bioreactor culture (Ferdous et al. 2011)

HASMC and HAVIC obtained from non-sclerotic patients, molded in tubular collagen-cell mixture and cultured in pneumatic bioreactor with osteogenic media for 9 or 21 d

collagen I,MMP-2↑; calcium deposition↑; Runx2,ALP,αSMA↑; HASMCs expresses higher osteogenic markers and matrix remodeling than HAVICs

Comparing vascular versus valvular calcification with tissue-engineered collagen gels

Could not interprete regional differences due to mechanical force variation

VICs 3D culture (Lim et al. 2016)

mVICs were encapsulated in 2 mg/mL collagen, treated with 5 mmol/L β-GP, and 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid in α-MEM

thickness, calcification↑; fibronectin, a-SMA, collagen receptor, discoidin domain tyrosine kinase receptor 2↑; F-actin, NF-κB, JNK↑

linking inflammation with the clinical features of aortic stenosis: valvular retraction, stiffening, and formation of calcified nodules

Inflammatory factors are limited to TNF-α

VICs 3D culture (Hjortnaes et al., 2015)

10-m pVICs cultured in 1% HAMA-5% GelMA, treated by TGFβ

vimentin, αSMA, MMP9, Col1A1↑

enlable to maintain a quiescent VIC phenotype before stimulation

Hydrogel platforms are not in an environment of repetitive strain and pressure

VECs and VICs co-culture (Gee et al. 2021)

pVECs and pVICs seeded in a mechanically constrained collagen alone or in co-culture configurations

cell and matrix aggregates↑; αSMA,pSAMD2,ACTA2↑; SOX9↓

The model supports its use to test mechanisms of intercellular communication in valves and their pharmacological control

mechanical characterization of collagen gel is not feasible

VECs and VICs co-culture (Bramsen et al. 2022)

6–8 m pAVICs were seeded into and pAVEC were seeded on top of hydrogels with different collagen composition (Con:1.5 mg/mL; stiff: 2.2 mg/mL; with CS: 1.5 mg/mL collagen + 20 mg/mL CS; + HA:1.5 mg/mL collagen + 20 mg/mL HA) for 2w

αSMA,ALP↑; cellular invasion rates↑; proliferation activity↑

GAGs (CS and HA) mimic altered ECM (matrix mineralization situation) to study EndMT-derived aVIC activity

Gender was not addressed

VECs and VICs co-culture (Vadana et al. 2020)

VICs and VECs from calcified human, Gelatin-based 3D constructs with VIC encapsulated in hydrogel and VEC seeded on top, exposed to osteogenic medium (10 mmol/L β-GP, 10 ng/mL ascorbic acid and 10−8 mol/L dexamethasone)

αSMA↓; vimentin-; MMP1,MMP13,MMP2, MMP9↑; Runx2, OCN,OPN↑; HG trigger BMP and TGF-β signaling further

3D model with human valvular cells plus high glucose imply the increased risk of degenerative aortic valve disease and calcification found in diabetic patients

Lack of flow-induced shear stress and hemodynamic forces

3D-bioprinting (Immohr et al. 2022)

oVICs dissolved in a hydrogel composed of 2% alginate and 8% gelatin, 3D bioprinting and incubated for 28d

cell viability↑

reduce associated VIC damage and increase long-term cell viability

cannot establish 3D-bioprinting of even more vulnerable aortic valvular endothelial cells

3D-bioprinting (Immohr et al. 2023)

oVICs and VECs, dissolved in a hydrogel consisting of 2% alginate and 8% gelatin, 3D bioprinting with architectures

cell viability↑

first 3D-bioprinted AV model combining both VIC and VEC in a single multicellular construct

unintentional concomitant induction of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition