- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Harnessing stem cell and lineage reprogramming technology to treat cardiac fibrosis
Cell Regeneration volume 12, Article number: 39 (2023)
Abstract
Cardiac fibrosis is a pathological response characterized by excessive deposition of fibrous connective tissue within the heart. It typically occurs following cardiac injuries or diseases. However, the lack of suitable models for disease modeling and high-throughput drug discovery has hindered the establishment of an effective treatments for cardiac fibrosis. The emergence and rapid progress of stem-cell and lineage reprogramming technology offer an unprecedented opportunity to develop an improved humanized and patient-specific model for studying cardiac fibrosis, providing a platform for screening potential drugs and synchronously elucidating the underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, reprogramming cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells to reduce scar volume and induce myocardial tissue regeneration is a promising approach in treating cardiac fibrosis. In this review, we summarize the current advancements in stem cell technologies applied to study cardiac fibrosis and provide insights for future investigations into its mechanisms, drug discovery as well as therapy method.
Background
Cardiac fibrosis is a prevalent pathological alteration observed in the advanced stages of most cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). This debilitating condition is frequently associated with various cardiac disorders, resulting in impaired heart function and potentially life-threatening complications such as heart failure (Heidenreich et al. 2022). Pathological cardiac fibrosis is characterized by an excessive accumulation of fibrous tissue in the cardiac muscle, resulting from an uncontrolled tissue repair process primarily orchestrated by myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts differentiating from fibroblasts upon stimulation are distinguished by the presence of smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and increased production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (Frangogiannis 2021; Ivey and Tallquist 2016; Ma et al. 2018). The process of myocardial fibrosis is associated with mechanical stimulation, paracrine effects among different cells, and the presence of pro-fibrotic factors or molecules derived from the circulatory system. Ultimately, this leads to an increased ratio of cardiac fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1). The progressive accumulation of ECM replaces functional muscle tissues, resulting in adverse cardiac remodeling and significantly impairing myocardial contractile function.
Cardiac fibrosis can be attributed to non-infarcted injuries, including pressure overload, volume overload, metabolic dysfunction, and aging (Biernacka and Frangogiannis 2011; Borer et al. 2002). The activation of resident interstitial cell populations and other cell types such as cardiomyocytes and macrophages primarily drive the proliferation of activated myofibroblasts after myocardial injury (Brown et al. 2005; Frangogiannis 2012; Fu et al. 2018; Hinz 2010). The induction mechanism of fibrosis signals depends on the type of primary myocardial injury. The neurohumoral pathway activation directly stimulates fibroblasts or influences the immune cell population to activate them (Kurisu et al. 2003). Cytokines and growth factors, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Interleukin (IL) -1, IL-10, IL-11, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family members, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), are secreted in the cardiac interstitium and specifically activating aspects of the fibrotic response (Flevaris et al. 2017; Gallini et al. 2016; Hofmann et al. 2014; Koitabashi et al. 2011). The secreted fibrotic mediators and matrix proteins bind to the cell surface receptors of fibroblasts, such as cytokine receptors, integrins, syndecans, transducing intracellular signaling cascades to regulate genes involved in ECM synthesis, processing, and metabolism (Berk et al. 2007; Frangogiannis 2017). The endogenous pathways involved in the negative regulation of fibrosis can protect the myocardium from an excessive fibrotic response which are crucial for heart repair. However, persistent heart damage disrupts the balance between fibrotic repair and its negative feedback regulation, leading to over-activation of myofibroblasts and excessive accumulation of ECM. Currently, heart fibrosis therapy faces several challenges (Fig. 1). The clinical treatments for cardiac fibrosis, including surgical interventions and pharmacotherapy, demonstrate limited efficacy or present insurmountable drawbacks. Surgical treatments for the prevention or management of advanced cardiac fibrosis encompass valve repair and heart transplantation. However, significant concerns including high surgical mortality rates, postoperative infections, and prolonged recovery periods cannot be disregarded (Marrouche et al. 2022). Moreover, the scarcity of heart donors and post-transplant immune rejection leave patients with cardiac fibrosis with few viable options.
Current pharmacological treatments for cardiac fibrosis primarily involve general anti-fibrotic drugs and cardiovascular protective medications (Spinale 2007). Pharmacologic therapies, such as angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, statins, aldosterone antagonists, and emerging therapies like histone deacetylase inhibitors, have been demonstrated to promote ‘reverse remodeling’. This has been proven to ameliorate cardiac fibrosis and subsequently reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmia (Dimas et al. 2011; Massare et al. 2010) as well as the incidence of sudden cardiac death (Spinale 2007). However, despite anti-fibrotic drugs can partially inhibit the further expansion of fibrous tissue, their effectiveness in reversing established fibrosis is minimal (Zhao et al. 2022). Cardiovascular protective medications, such as beta receptor blockers and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, can enhance cardiac function. However, they are unable to reverse existing fibrosis. Moreover, long-term medication usage may bring about drug tolerance and adverse effects (Rios et al. 2020). Currently, numerous small molecules or compounds are undergoing clinical trials for fibrosis treatment. However, most of them primarily focus on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or myelofibrosis (Zhao et al. 2022). Considering the presence of organ heterogeneity, the developments of specific drugs targeting myocardial fibrosis are significantly limited.
Obtaining human autologous heart cells poses a significant challenge (Smits et al. 2009), thus the utilization of animal models such as mice and rats is commonly favored in cardiac fibrosis research (Savoji et al. 2019). However, notable disparities exist between the physiological characteristics of human and mouse hearts, and animal models are unsuitable for high-throughput drug screening due to intricate in vivo pharmacokinetics and economic limitations. Other cell models, like immortalized human fibroblast lines, have limitations including a singular cell type and lack of structural organization. Additionally, their short viability and dependence on experimenters greatly impede further investigation (Eglen and Reisine 2011). Consequently, the development of antifibrotic drugs targeting heart disease progresses at a slower pace compared to fields like oncology and metabolism due to the absence of appropriate human cardiac fibrosis models.
Key regulators of cardiac fibrosis
Cardiac fibrosis is characterized by the excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins by cardiac fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, serving as a prominent hallmark in various cardiac disorders, including arrhythmia, hypertrophy, and heart failure. This pathological process is triggered by a range of stimuli, such as myocardial injury, inflammatory processes, and mechanical strain. The fibrogenesis cascade is tightly regulated by diverse signaling pathways and various cell types (Fig. 2).
The mechanosensitive activation of fibroblasts may have evolved as a protective mechanism to preserve tissue integrity, mitigating the potentially devastating effects of mechanical forces on tissue structure. However, within the cardiac context, prolonged mechanical tension can lead to sustained fibroblast activation and excessive collagen deposition, ultimately resulting in adverse alterations to myocardial structure and impaired functionality. Mechanical stress can initiate fibroblast activation through various mechanisms, including integrins (MacKenna et al. 1998), mechanosensitive ion channels (Rahaman et al. 2014), and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Barnes et al. 2018).
The activation of GPCRs can initiate signaling pathways that coordinate the fibroblast response to mechanical stress. These pathways involve crucial components such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Leask 2013), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Wang et al. 2003), RhoA/Rho kinase (ROCK) (Shimizu and Liao 2016), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling (Frangogiannis 2021). The presence of intracellular calcium ions (Ca2+) plays a pivotal role in initiating cardiac fibrogenesis in response to mechanical stress (Lin et al. 2019; Yue et al. 2013; Du et al. 2010). Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, renowned for their distinctive characteristics, have garnered prominence as the primary ion channels responsible for mediating Ca2+ signals in cardiac fibroblasts. There is an increasing body of evidence suggesting the therapeutic potential of numerous TRP channels as targets for drug interventions. Nevertheless, a more comprehensive comprehension of the functions of TRP channels in the heart is indispensable (Feng et al. 2019).
Following myocardial damage, a plethora of signaling molecules such as chemokines, cytokines and growth factors are released, triggering the activation of cardiac fibroblasts through diverse pathways. The RAAS is activated during the process of cardiac fibrosis and interacts with pathways that contribute to fibrosis (Xu et al. 2010). Angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a pivotal role in the transformation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts by binding to the Ang II receptor type 1 (AT1R) (Kawano et al. 2000). TGF-β activates fibroblasts through both canonical SMAD2/3 signaling and non-canonical TGF-beta activated kinase 1(TAK1)-mediated p38 phosphorylation (Frangogiannis 2022; Kim et al. 2018; Hu et al. 2018). In summary, the TGF-β signaling pathway assumes a central role in cardiac fibroblast differentiation and the development of cardiac fibrosis (Fig. 2). Furthermore, TGF-β1 signaling induces an upregulation of IL-11 secretion in human fibroblasts, while in vivo studies with global IL-11Ra loss demonstrate reduced interstitial fibrotic remodeling under pressure overload conditions. The impact of IL-11 on fibroblast activation involves post-transcriptional mechanisms mediated by extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling (Liu et al. 2020).
In mammals, the Wnt signaling pathway plays a crucial role in embryonic development but remains inactive in adult tissues with low turnover, such as the heart (Bastakoty and Young 2016; Aisagbonhi et al. 2011). The Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibits the destruction complex composed of Axin complex, which includes casein kinase 1 (CK1), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), leading to the accumulation of β-catenin (Frangogiannis 2022). Furthermore, in murine subjects, CFs β-catenin knockout reduces cardiac fibrosis by downregulating collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1), collagen type III alpha 1 chain (COL3A1), and periostin expression levels (Xiang et al. 2017). Targeting these pathways therapeutically has garnered significant scientific and clinical interest.
Stem cells provide optimal in vitro models for cardiac fibrosis
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), including human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), have substantially expanded the availability of human cells for modeling cardiac fibrosis and discovering drugs due to their ability to unlimitedly self-renew and differentiate into types of cells within the body (Parrotta et al. 2020). The in vitro cardiac fibrosis model using hPSCs-derived quiescent cardiac fibroblasts has reported the responsiveness to fibrotic stimulation (Zhang et al. 2019). However, a 2D in vitro system comprising only fibroblasts cannot precisely model disease context of the fibrotic heart, where contractile cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts are closely connected to form the 3D functional tissue.
Fortunately, recent advancements in stem cell and tissue engineering technology have significantly facilitated the development of 3D systems at the tissue level. This progress is expected to greatly enhance the construction of more reliable cardiac fibrosis models (Fig. 3). There exist substantial differences in both structure and physiological properties between 2 and 3D cardiac cell cultures (Pontes Soares et al. 2012), which implies that different results can be obtained from either a 2D or a 3D modeling approach. For examples, the cardiac cells grown in a 3D context exhibit smaller size, increased intercellular junctions, and less prominent cytoskeletal network compared to those cultured in a 2D context. Conversely, the cardiomyocytes cultured in a 2D environment demonstrate underdeveloped excitation–contraction coupling, slow action potential conduction, and inefficient energy conversion (Pontes Soares et al. 2012; Abbott 2003). Furthermore, studies have indicated that cells cultured in a 3D setting display reduced sensitivity to drugs and mechanical stimuli as well as decreased resistance to apoptotic signals (Li et al. 2016; Li et al. 2008; Bokhari et al. 2007).
Therefore, employing 3D models offers significant advantages over traditional 2D models for investigating cardiac fibrosis.
The 3D structure closely resembles an actual patient's heart, enabling comprehensive observations of mechanical stimulation on cardiac fibrosis. Various devices have been developed to mimic different forms of force (Occhetta et al. 2018; Kong et al. 2019; Rogers et al. 2019; Bracco Gartner et al. 2023), thereby accelerating researches on the impact of mechanical forces on cardiac fibrosis. Moreover, cardiac cells differentiated from hPSCs cultured in 3D models exhibit a higher level of maturity compared to those in 2D models (Lange et al. 2021) This is attributed to the presence of intercellular interactions, ECM interactions, and microenvironmental stimuli.
Spheroid cultures have been extensively studied in CVDs research for their enhanced integration of biochemical and physiological characteristics, which are similar to real heart within a well-defined 3D architectural microenvironment when compared to 2D monolayer cultures (Beauchamp et al. 2015). The spheroids can be derived from various cell types, including both somatic and stem/progenitor cells, as well as resident cardiac stromal cells. Despite their simplicity, these spheroids offer valuable preliminary models for investigating complex pathological conditions such as tissue stiffening and fibrosis (Edmondson et al. 2014; Polonchuk et al. 2017; Sacchi et al. 2020; Garoffolo et al. 2022). Cardiac organoid represents a more complex form of 3D microtissue, which are self-assembling structures of cardiac cell types obtained from the proliferation and differentiation of hPSCs. The cardiac organoids are attempted to replicate cell–cell interaction, cell-ECM interaction, and organ architecture and function at a microscale level, as proximal as possible to the in vivo histological features (Nugraha et al. 2019; Lewis-Israeli et al. 2021). More significantly, cardiac organoids serve as a crucial model for the discovery and evaluation of novel drugs and treatments, transforming "personalized medicine" from bench to bed. The self-organizing nature of cardiac organoids enables considerably higher throughput compared to engineered heart tissues (EHTs) or animal models in drug screening owing to their simplified fabrication process and smaller cell count per organoid (~ 5,000 cells) (Drakhlis et al. 2021). In addition, organoids enable personalized medicine approaches using the hiPSCs with patient’s genetic background and to evaluate drug effects on human cardiac development and gene expression pattern. Based on these advantages, cardiac organoids are already used in drug testing for CVDs (Lee et al. 2020; Paik et al. 2020). Mi-Ok Lee et al. established an in vitro 3D microtissues derived from hESCs to model cardiac fibrosis, they demonstrated that the addition of appropriate amount of CD44+ human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) (about 40%) derived from hESCs better mimics the pathological process of cardiac fibrosis (Lee et al. 2019). Similarly, the cardiac fibrosis model constructed by Iseoka et al. demonstrated that cardiac tissues comprising 50%–70% cardiomyocytes exhibited enhanced responsiveness to fibrotic stimulation, thereby enabling precise screening of anti-fibrotic drugs (Iseoka et al. 2021).
Despite the rapid advancements in this field, there is still a lack of highly efficient and reproducible methods for the generation of cardiac organoids and universally applicable culture conditions for all cardiac cell types. The generation of cardiac organoids has not yet undergone the sequential processes of looping, ballooning, trabeculation, and compaction, which are crucial for chamber formation in a native heart (Kim et al. 2021). Moreover, current cardiac organoids lack spatial organization and perfusable blood vessels, limiting their size and posing challenges for long-term maintenance as they grow larger. Additionally, the pumping function mediated through muscle contraction and vascular transportation has not been observed thus far (Zhao et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2021; Feng et al. 2022). Therefore, cardiac organoids derived from hPSCs exhibit characteristics more reminiscent of fetal hearts rather than adult hearts.
Although current cardiac organoids are unlikely to fully replace animal models in preclinical studies, ongoing efforts will help bridge the gap between in vivo and in vitro applications in the future (Kim et al. 2022; Sahara 2023).
Stem cell therapy for treating cardiac fibrosis
In recent years, stem cell technology has provided a ray of hope for the treatment of numerous ‘intractable diseases’, and its remarkable efficacy in combating heart diseases has equally demonstrated the immense potential of stem cells in addressing cardiac conditions. Given that cardiomyocytes are terminally differentiated, any damage incurred results in permanent loss and subsequent replacement by scar tissue within the damaged myocardium. This process often ends with complications such as heart failure and malignant arrhythmias, significantly impacting overall quality of life. Researchers have harnessed the regenerative potential of different types of stem cells, such as hMSCs, hESCs and hiPSCs, to target the damaged heart tissue and promote its repair and regeneration. One of the primary mechanisms by which stem cells combat cardiac fibrosis is their capacity to differentiate into specialized cardiac cells. These cellular components play crucial roles in the regeneration of damaged myocardial tissue and restoration of cardiac function (Zhao et al. 2022). The secretion of various growth factors and cytokines by stem cells further facilitates the recruitment of endogenous repairing cells and stimulates the formation of new blood vessels, thereby promoting the hemodynamics of the heart (Ishigami et al. 2018; Quijada and Sussman 2014).
MSCs possess a range of characteristics, including anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, immune-modulatory, and pro-angiogenic properties through secreting various molecules with anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory activities, thereby promoting the regeneration of damaged heart tissues (Razeghian-Jahromi et al. 2021). Extensive preclinical and clinical investigations have demonstrated the potential of MSCs transplantation in offering protection against diverse CVDs such as acute myocardial infarction (MI), both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure, chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. Notably, these reports and clinical trials over the past decades have indicated limited cardiomyogenic potential and modest improvement in cardiac function for ischemic cardiomyopathy of MSCs based therapy (Silva et al. 2005; Hare et al. 2012; Mathiasen et al. 2015).
hPSCs possess clonogenic, self-renewing, and pluripotent properties, making them highly expandable and capable of in vitro differentiation into cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs). This feature illustrates the potential to obtain abundant cardiomyocytes for transplantation (Chen et al. 2023). Thus, hPSCs also serve as promising resources for the treatment of myocardial fibrosis (Fig. 1). The transplantation of hPSC-CMs holds the potential to directly enhance cardiac function in individuals with reduced fibrosis and increased vascular density. Additionally, hPSC-CMs can enhance cardiac tissue regeneration and repair processes by secreting growth factors, cytokines, and other signaling molecules (Dessouki et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2020). However, the limited engraftment rate of transplanted cells remains a significant hindrance to the effectiveness of this cell therapy (Ishigami et al. 2018; Qu et al. 1998; Tang et al. 2010). Safety concerns such as arrhythmias and potential tumorigenesis have been reported in hPSC-CMs-based therapy (Chong et al. 2014).
The ideal approach for hPSC-CMs transplantation has been extensively investigated through numerous studies, encompassing three distinct methodologies: coronary artery injection, myocardial injection of cell sheets, and utilization of 3D patches. However, the direct injection of dissociated single cells into the myocardium or coronary artery yields a transplantation success rate below 10% (Hsiao et al. 2013; Behfar et al. 2014). Therefore, several studies have been dedicated to the development of innovative injection techniques aimed at raising cell retention rates, such as co-transplantation with human MSCs that release anti-apoptotic factors (Templin et al. 2012). In addition, recent years have witnessed the development of various novel tissue engineering strategies aimed at enhancing cell transport in myocardial regeneration therapy. Engineered cell sheets, as compared to direct injection, owe the advantage of delivering a large number of cells to damaged tissues without engendering transplanted cell loss or causing damage to the host myocardium. Moreover, the application of hPSC-CMs embedded in 3D patches promotes their continuous maturation and might provide further value as a potential therapy (Zhang et al. 2013; Sun and Nunes 2017; Gao et al. 2018).
Recently, researchers have been investigating multiple approaches to enhance the engraftment of hPSC-CMs. Notably, the Ye laboratory has reported the promotion of thymosin β4 (Tβ4) in the implantation of hPSC-CMs in a subacute myocardial infarction pig model (Tan et al. 2021). They have confirmed that combination therapy with Tβ4 can significantly enhance hPSC-CMs implantation and angiogenesis, promote the proliferation of endogenous cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells and alleviate adverse cardiac remodeling. Importantly, no safety concerns such as ventricular arrhythmias or tumor formation were observed. Zhao et al. also demonstrated that over-expression of Cyclin D2 in hPSC-CMs enhances heart function, reduces fibrotic scar size and ventricular hypertrophy, and decreases cardiomyocyte apoptosis with increased vascular density (Zhao et al. 2021).
Considering that cardiac fibrosis commonly accompanies the majority of CVDs, the clinical application of hPSC-CMs holds great promise in treating these diseases. The immense potential of stem cell-based therapy for CVDs ensures that both preclinical and clinical investigations will continue unabated. At present, there are four ongoing clinical trials utilizing hPSC-CMs to treat patients with CVDs (Sridharan et al. 2023).
Cell reprogramming technique for treating cardiac fibrosis
Given that direct reprogramming can generate reprogrammed cells in situ in diseased organs of animal models, its utilization may overcome technical challenges associated with iPSC technology, such as in vitro reprogramming and large-scale amplification. Cardiac fibroblasts have been the primary source for cardiomyocyte conversion due to their activation and demonstrated contribution to fibrosis and scar formation following heart injury. The in vivo reprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts has resulted in the replenishment of cardiomyocyte pools and reduced scar formation, suggesting a potential pathway for treating cardiac fibrosis. Research has indicated that by inducing trans-differentiation of fibroblasts into various cell types, including cardiomyocytes (Cao et al. 2016) or endothelial cells (Han et al. 2021; Lee et al. 2017), it is possible to mitigate the accumulation of fibrous tissue and facilitate tissue repair (Fig. 4).
This trans-differentiation process can be achieved through various methods, including the utilization of transcription factors (Zhang et al. 2017), gene editing tools (Lee et al. 2017), or small molecules (Cao et al. 2016). The first approach introduced involves coaxing fibroblasts to undergo in vitro reprogramming into cardiomyocyte-like cells, either by redirecting incompletely reprogrammed cells towards a cardiac phenotype using the inherent reprogramming strategy or by introducing the three transcription factors GATA binding protein 4 (GATA4), myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C), and T-box transcription factor 5 (TBX5) (GMT) into cultured fibroblasts (Efe et al. 2011; Ieda et al. 2010). Subsequently, efforts were made to investigate the acquisition of reprogrammed and authentic cardiomyocytes in vivo. Jayawardena et al. initially demonstrated successful conversion of cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes within scarred and peri-infarct areas of mouse hearts through direct lentiviral delivery of miRNAs (miRNAs-1, 133, 208, and 499), with enhanced reprogramming effects observed when combined with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor I treatment (Jayawardena et al. 2012). In a study leaded by Dr. Qian, the researchers discovered that fibroblasts undergoing proliferation were directly reprogrammed into relatively mature cardiomyocytes with authentic action potentials (APs) and contractile ability through over-expression of GMT mediated by a retroviral system. This was confirmed by strict lineage tracing experiments. Additionally, they reported an enhanced reprogramming efficiency of 12% compared to the typical 5–10% in vitro efficiency. The reprogrammed cardiomyocytes exhibited similar transcriptional profiles and physiological features as endogenous adult cardiomyocytes, suggesting the influence of both cellular and extracellular environments. Importantly, following the delivery of GMT for 8–12 weeks in post-MI mice, new cardiomyocytes were observed in scar areas, aligning with significant and long-lasting improvements in cardiac function and reduced scar size as demonstrated by echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (Qian et al. 2012).
Given the presence of species variations, more intricate reprogramming cocktails were required for human cardiac reprogramming. Fu et al. employed GMT in conjunction with estrogen-related receptor gamma (ESSRG), mesoderm posterior bHLH transcription factor 1 (MESP1), myocardin (MYOCD), and zinc finger protein, multitype 2 (ZEPM2) to convert human fibroblasts into human induced cardiomyocyte-like cells (hiCMs) (Fu et al. 2013), while Wada et al. demonstrated that a combination of GMT along with MESP1 and MYOCD was sufficient for hiCM conversion in coculture with murine cardiomyocytes (Wada et al. 2013). In recent years, Zhou et al. developed an optimized protocol using MGT plus miR133 based on single-cell transcriptomic analysis, which achieved an efficiency of 40%-60% in generating hiCMs (Garbutt et al. 2020; Zhou et al. 2019).
Although new reprogramming protocols have been investigated to enhance the efficiency of reprogramming, cardiac cells generated through genetic methods exhibit heterogeneity and a low proportion of truly functional hiCMs that spontaneously beat and display cardiac Aps (Xie et al. 2022). In comparison to viral-based gene delivery methods, small molecules offer the advantage of being non-immunogenic and cost-effective, along with easily standardized protocols. Our research group has successfully reprogrammed human fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes (chemically induced cardiomyocytes, ciCMs) using a combination of nine small molecules: CHIR99021, A83-01, BIX01294, AS8351, SC1, Y-27632, OAC2, together with two inhibitors of platelet-derived growth factor receptors, namely SU16F and JNJ10198409 (Cao et al. 2016). The underlying mechanism is that 9C can induce an epigenetic state characterized by open chromatin structure in somatic cells, enabling them to respond to external cardiogenic signals (Fig. 4). Moreover, the transplantation of 9C-treated human foreskin fibroblasts into the infarcted hearts of immunodeficient mice resulted in robust expression of cardiac markers, well-organized sarcomeres, and partial re-muscularization within the infarcted area. The ciCMs closely resembled human cardiomyocytes in terms of transcriptome, epigenetic features, and electrophysiological properties. This discovery establishes a foundation for potential in situ repair of the heart through targeted modulation of endogenous cardiac fibroblasts using small molecules.
Using similar strategy, we have recently reported the generation of chemically induced cardiovascular progenitor cells (ciCPCs) from mouse and human fibroblasts, which possess multipotency to differentiate into various types of cardiovascular cells using a transgene-free reprogramming approach involving six small molecules: CHIR99021, A83-01, GSK126, Forskolin (an adenylyl cyclase activator), CTPB (a P300 histone acetyltransferase activator), and AM580 (a RARα activator) (Wang et al. 2022). Subsequent transplantation of these ciCPCs into infarcted mouse hearts resulted in improved animal survival and cardiac function for up to 13 weeks post-infarction. Furthermore, considering the autologous nature of ciCPCs, these infinitely renewable cardiovascular cells offer the potential for biobanking patient-specific stem cells, thereby playing a crucial role in personalized cell therapy and precise drug screening targeting cardiac fibrosis.
Despite the considerable potential of stem cell therapy in addressing cardiac fibrosis, there are still several obstacles need to be overcome. These challenges encompass the selection of appropriate stem cells sources, concerns regarding biosafety during cell transplantation, and the necessity to improve cell survival and retention rates, among other factors. The advantages and disadvantages of stem cell transplantation and cell reprogramming for cardiac fibrosis therapy are summarized in Table 1. Moreover, in order to develop more effective and targeted treatment approaches, it is crucial to gain a comprehensive understanding of the intricate pathological mechanisms involved in fibrosis.
Conclusions and perspectives
In summary, stem cell therapy for cardiac fibrosis is an advancing field with promising prospects for the future. Ongoing research and technological advancements are propelling these therapeutic approaches towards potential success. However, several challenges persist in current stem cell treatments. Further investigation is required to address issues such as the selection of appropriate stem cell sources, biosafety concerns, and the feasibility to monitor treatment efficacy. Moreover, ensuring the successful engraftment and survival of transplanted stem cells into the heart remains to be tackled. Many transplanted cells do not exhibit long-term viability or fail to differentiate into functional cardiac cells, thereby impeding the overall effectiveness of this therapy. To ensure the safety and efficient implementation of these stem cell-based approaches, rigorous clinical studies and repeated validation are indispensable. Efforts are underway to establish a high-throughput drug screening platform for the development of novel therapies. Striking a balance between complexity and user-friendliness is pivotal for this platform. Through comprehensive research and validation, we can surmount these challenges and unlock the full potential of stem cell therapy for cardiac fibrosis in the future.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ACE:
-
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme
- α-SMA:
-
α-Smooth muscle actin
- APC:
-
Adenomatous polyposis coli
- APs:
-
Action potentials
- Ang II:
-
Angiotensin II
- AT1R:
-
Ang II receptor type 1
- ciCPCs:
-
Chemically induced cardiovascular progenitor cells
- ciCMs:
-
Chemically induced cardiomyocytes cells
- CMs:
-
Cardiomyocytes
- CFs:
-
Cardiac fibroblasts
- CVDs:
-
Cardiovascular diseases
- COL1A1:
-
Collagen type I alpha 1 chain
- COL3A1:
-
Collagen type III alpha 1 chain
- CK1:
-
Casein kinase 1
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- EHTs:
-
Engineered heart tissues
- ESSRG:
-
Estrogen-related receptor gamma
- FAK:
-
Focal adhesion kinase
- GPCR:
-
G-protein coupled receptors
- GATA4:
-
GATA binding protein 4
- GSK3:
-
Glycogen synthase kinase 3
- hESCs:
-
Human embryonic stem cells
- hESC-CMs:
-
Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte
- hiPSCs:
-
Human induced pluripotent stem cells
- hiPSC-CMs:
-
HiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes
- hPSCs:
-
Human pluripotent stem cells
- hPSC-CMs:
-
HPSC-derived cardiomyocytes
- hPSC-CFs:
-
HPSC-derived cardiac fibroblasts
- hPSC-ECs:
-
HPSC-derive endothelial cells
- hMSCs:
-
Human mesenchymal stem cells
- hiCMs:
-
Human induced cardiomyocytes-like cells
- IL:
-
Interleukin
- IPF:
-
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- MI:
-
Myocardial infarction
- MAPK:
-
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MEF2C:
-
Myocyte enhancer factor 2C
- MRI:
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- MYOCD:
-
Myocardin
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stem cells
- NASH:
-
non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
- PDGF:
-
Platelet-derived growth factor
- PI3K:
-
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- RAAS:
-
Renin angiotensin aldosterone system
- ROCK:
-
RhoA/Rho kinase
- TGF-β:
-
transforming growth factor-β
- Tβ4:
-
Thymosin β4
- TRP:
-
Transient receptor potential
- TBX5:
-
T-box transcription factor 5
- Wnt/β-catenin:
-
Wnt family/β-catenin
- ZFPM2:
-
Zinc finger protein, multitype 2
References
Abbott A. Cell culture: biology’s new dimension. Nature. 2003;424(6951):870–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/424870a.
Aisagbonhi O, Rai M, Ryzhov S, Atria N, Feoktistov I, Hatzopoulos AK. Experimental myocardial infarction triggers canonical Wnt signaling and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(4):469–83. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.006510.
Bao X, Lian X, Qian T, Bhute VJ, Han T, Palecek SP. Directed differentiation and long-term maintenance of epicardial cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells under fully defined conditions. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(9):1890–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.080.
Barnes LA, Marshall CD, Leavitt T, Hu MS, Moore AL, Gonzalez JG, et al. Mechanical Forces in Cutaneous Wound Healing: Emerging Therapies to Minimize Scar Formation. Adv Wound Care (new Rochelle). 2018;7(2):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2016.0709.
Bastakoty D, Young PP. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in tissue injury: roles in pathology and therapeutic opportunities for regeneration. FASEB J. 2016;30(10):3271–84. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600502R.
Beauchamp P, Moritz W, Kelm JM, Ullrich ND, Agarkova I, Anson BD, et al. Development and Characterization of a Scaffold-Free 3D Spheroid Model of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Human Cardiomyocytes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21(8):852–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0376.
Behfar A, Crespo-Diaz R, Terzic A, Gersh BJ. Cell therapy for cardiac repair–lessons from clinical trials. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(4):232–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.9.
Berk BC, Fujiwara K, Lehoux S. ECM remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(3):568–75. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI31044.
Biernacka A, Frangogiannis NG. Aging and Cardiac Fibrosis. Aging Dis. 2011;2(2):158–73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21837283.
Bokhari M, Carnachan RJ, Cameron NR, Przyborski SA. Culture of HepG2 liver cells on three dimensional polystyrene scaffolds enhances cell structure and function during toxicological challenge. J Anat. 2007;211(4):567–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00778.x.
Borer JS, Truter S, Herrold EM, Falcone DJ, Pena M, Carter JN, et al. Myocardial fibrosis in chronic aortic regurgitation: molecular and cellular responses to volume overload. Circulation. 2002;105(15):1837–42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000014419.71706.85.
Bracco Gartner TCL, Wang Y, Leiteris L, van Adrichem I, Marsman J, Goumans MJ, et al. Cyclic strain has antifibrotic effects on the human cardiac fibroblast transcriptome in a human cardiac fibrosis-on-a-chip platform. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;144:105980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105980.
Brown RD, Ambler SK, Mitchell MD, Long CS. The cardiac fibroblast: therapeutic target in myocardial remodeling and failure. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:657–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095802.
Cao N, Huang Y, Zheng J, Spencer CI, Zhang Y, Fu JD, et al. Conversion of human fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by small molecules. Science. 2016;352(6290):1216–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1502.
Chen Y, Wu Y, Li J, Chen K, Wang W, Ye Z, et al. Cooperative regulation of Zhx1 and hnRNPA1 drives the cardiac progenitor-specific transcriptional activation during cardiomyocyte differentiation. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01548-1.
Chong JJ, Yang X, Don CW, Minami E, Liu YW, Weyers JJ, et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature. 2014;510(7504):273–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13233.
Dessouki FBA, Kukreja RC, Singla DK. Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Doxorubicin-Induced Muscle Toxicity through Counteracting Pyroptosis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020;13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13120450.
de Lange WJ, Farrell ET, Kreitzer CR, Jacobs DR, Lang D, Glukhov AV, et al. Human iPSC-engineered cardiac tissue platform faithfully models important cardiac physiology. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021;320(4):H1670–86. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00941.2020.
Dimas V, Ayers C, Daniels J, Joglar JA, Hill JA, Naseem RH. Spironolactone therapy is associated with reduced ventricular tachycardia rate in patients with cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(3):309–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02888.x.
Drakhlis L, Biswanath S, Farr CM, Lupanow V, Teske J, Ritzenhoff K, et al. Human heart-forming organoids recapitulate early heart and foregut development. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(6):737–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00815-9.
Du J, Xie J, Zhang Z, Tsujikawa H, Fusco D, Silverman D, et al. TRPM7-mediated Ca2+ signals confer fibrogenesis in human atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 2010;106(5):992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.206771.
Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12(4):207–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2014.573.
Efe JA, Hilcove S, Kim J, Zhou H, Ouyang K, Wang G, et al. Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(3):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2164.
Eglen R, Reisine T. Primary cells and stem cells in drug discovery: emerging tools for high-throughput screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2011;9(2):108–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2010.0305.
Feng J, Armillei MK, Yu AS, Liang BT, Runnels LW, Yue L. Ca(2+) Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts and Fibrosis-Associated Heart Diseases. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd6040034.
Feng W, Schriever H, Jiang S, Bais A, Wu H, Kostka D, et al. Computational profiling of hiPSC-derived heart organoids reveals chamber defects associated with NKX2-5 deficiency. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03346-4.
Flevaris P, Khan SS, Eren M, Schuldt AJT, Shah SJ, Lee DC, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type i controls cardiomyocyte transforming growth factor-beta and cardiac fibrosis. Circulation. 2017;136(7):664–79. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028145.
Frangogiannis NG. Regulation of the inflammatory response in cardiac repair. Circ Res. 2012;110(1):159–73. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.243162.
Frangogiannis NG. The extracellular matrix in myocardial injury, repair, and remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(5):1600–12. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI87491.
Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(6):1450–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa324.
Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor-beta in myocardial disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(7):435–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00646-w.
Fu JD, Stone NR, Liu L, Spencer CI, Qian L, Hayashi Y, et al. Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts toward a cardiomyocyte-like state. Stem Cell Reports. 2013;1(3):235–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.07.005.
Fu X, Khalil H, Kanisicak O, Boyer JG, Vagnozzi RJ, Maliken BD, et al. Specialized fibroblast differentiated states underlie scar formation in the infarcted mouse heart. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(5):2127–43. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI98215.
Gallini R, Lindblom P, Bondjers C, Betsholtz C, Andrae J. PDGF-A and PDGF-B induces cardiac fibrosis in transgenic mice. Exp Cell Res. 2016;349(2):282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.10.022.
Gao L, Gregorich ZR, Zhu W, Mattapally S, Oduk Y, Lou X, et al. Large Cardiac Muscle Patches Engineered From Human Induced-Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Cells Improve Recovery From Myocardial Infarction in Swine. Circulation. 2018;137(16):1712–30. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030785.
Garbutt TA, Zhou Y, Keepers B, Liu J, Qian L. An Optimized Protocol for Human Direct Cardiac Reprogramming. STAR Protoc. 2020;1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2019.100010.
Garoffolo G, Casaburo M, Amadeo F, Salvi M, Bernava G, Piacentini L, et al. Reduction of Cardiac Fibrosis by Interference With YAP-Dependent Transactivation. Circ Res. 2022;131(3):239–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319373.
Garry GA, Bezprozvannaya S, Chen K, Zhou H, Hashimoto H, Morales MG, et al. The histone reader PHF7 cooperates with the SWI/SNF complex at cardiac super enhancers to promote direct reprogramming. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(5):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00668-z.
Han JK, Shin Y, Sohn MH, Choi SB, Shin D, You Y, et al. Direct conversion of adult human fibroblasts into functional endothelial cells using defined factors. Biomaterials. 2021;272:120781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120781.
Hare JM, Fishman JE, Gerstenblith G, DiFede Velazquez DL, Zambrano JP, Suncion VY, et al. Comparison of allogeneic vs autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered by transendocardial injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: the POSEIDON randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308(22):2369–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.25321.
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e876–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001062.
Hinz B. The myofibroblast: paradigm for a mechanically active cell. J Biomech. 2010;43(1):146–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.020.
Hofmann U, Knorr S, Vogel B, Weirather J, Frey A, Ertl G, et al. Interleukin-13 deficiency aggravates healing and remodeling in male mice after experimental myocardial infarction. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(5):822–30. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.001020.
Hsiao LC, Carr C, Chang KC, Lin SZ, Clarke K. Stem cell-based therapy for ischemic heart disease. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(4):663–75. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X655109.
Hu HH, Chen DQ, Wang YN, Feng YL, Cao G, Vaziri ND, et al. New insights into TGF-beta/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis. Chem Biol Interact. 2018;292:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.07.008.
Ieda M, Fu JD, Delgado-Olguin P, Vedantham V, Hayashi Y, Bruneau BG, et al. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell. 2010;142(3):375–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.002.
Iseoka H, Miyagawa S, Sakai Y, Sawa Y. Cardiac fibrosis models using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac tissues allow anti-fibrotic drug screening in vitro. Stem Cell Res. 2021;54:102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2021.102420.
Ishigami M, Masumoto H, Ikuno T, Aoki T, Kawatou M, Minakata K, et al. Human iPS cell-derived cardiac tissue sheets for functional restoration of infarcted porcine hearts. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201650.
Ivey MJ, Tallquist MD. Defining the cardiac fibroblast. Circ J. 2016;80(11):2269–76. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1003.
Iyer D, Gambardella L, Bernard WG, Serrano F, Mascetti VL, Pedersen RA, et al. Robust derivation of epicardium and its differentiated smooth muscle cell progeny from human pluripotent stem cells. Development. 2015;142(8):1528–41. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119271.
Jayawardena TM, Egemnazarov B, Finch EA, Zhang L, Payne JA, Pandya K, et al. MicroRNA-mediated in vitro and in vivo direct reprogramming of cardiac fibroblasts to cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2012;110(11):1465–73. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.269035.
Kawano H, Do YS, Kawano Y, Starnes V, Barr M, Law RE, et al. Angiotensin II has multiple profibrotic effects in human cardiac fibroblasts. Circulation. 2000;101(10):1130–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.10.1130.
Kensah G, Roa Lara A, Dahlmann J, Zweigerdt R, Schwanke K, Hegermann J, et al. Murine and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac bodies form contractile myocardial tissue in vitro. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(15):1134–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs349.
Kim H, Wang M, Paik DT. Endothelial-Myocardial Angiocrine Signaling in Heart Development. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:697130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.697130.
Kim H, Kamm RD, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Wu JC. Progress in multicellular human cardiac organoids for clinical applications. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(4):503–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2022.03.012.
Kim KK, Sheppard D, Chapman HA. TGF-beta1 Signaling and Tissue Fibrosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(4). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022293.
Koitabashi N, Danner T, Zaiman AL, Pinto YM, Rowell J, Mankowski J, et al. Pivotal role of cardiomyocyte TGF-beta signaling in the murine pathological response to sustained pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(6):2301–12. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44824.
Kong M, Lee J, Yazdi IK, Miri AK, Lin YD, Seo J, et al. Cardiac Fibrotic Remodeling on a Chip with Dynamic Mechanical Stimulation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(3):e1801146. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801146.
Kurisu S, Ozono R, Oshima T, Kambe M, Ishida T, Sugino H, et al. Cardiac angiotensin II type 2 receptor activates the kinin/NO system and inhibits fibrosis. Hypertension. 2003;41(1):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000050101.90932.14.
Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014;345(6194):1247125. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247125.
Leask A. Integrin beta1: A Mechanosignaling Sensor Essential for Connective Tissue Deposition by Fibroblasts. Adv Wound Care (new Rochelle). 2013;2(4):160–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0365.
Lee S, Park C, Han JW, Kim JY, Cho K, Kim EJ, et al. Direct Reprogramming of Human Dermal Fibroblasts Into Endothelial Cells Using ER71/ETV2. Circ Res. 2017;120(5):848–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309833.
Lee MO, Jung KB, Jo SJ, Hyun SA, Moon KS, Seo JW, et al. Modelling cardiac fibrosis using three-dimensional cardiac microtissues derived from human embryonic stem cells. J Biol Eng. 2019;13:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-019-0139-6.
Lee J, Sutani A, Kaneko R, Takeuchi J, Sasano T, Kohda T, et al. In vitro generation of functional murine heart organoids via FGF4 and extracellular matrix. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18031-5.
Lewis-Israeli YR, Wasserman AH, Aguirre A. Heart Organoids and Engineered Heart Tissues: Novel Tools for Modeling Human Cardiac Biology and Disease. Biomolecules. 2021;11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11091277.
Li Y, Huang G, Li M, Wang L, Elson EL, Lu TJ, et al. An approach to quantifying 3D responses of cells to extreme strain. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19550. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19550.
Li CL, Tian T, Nan KJ, Zhao N, Guo YH, Cui J, et al. Survival advantages of multicellular spheroids vs. monolayers of HepG2 cells in vitro. Oncol Rep. 2008;20(6):1465–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801146.
Lin BL, Matera D, Doerner JF, Zheng N, Del Camino D, Mishra S, et al. In vivo selective inhibition of TRPC6 by antagonist BI 749327 ameliorates fibrosis and dysfunction in cardiac and renal disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(20):10156–61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815354116.
Liu YW, Chen B, Yang X, Fugate JA, Kalucki FA, Futakuchi-Tsuchida A, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes restore function in infarcted hearts of non-human primates. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(7):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4162.
Liu Z, Wang Y, Yan J, Liu J, Chen B, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human interleukin-11 in the treatment of acute leukaemia patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(1):262–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13152.
Lou X, Tang Y, Ye L, Pretorius D, Fast VG, Kahn-Krell AM, et al. Cardiac muscle patches containing four types of cardiac cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells improve recovery from cardiac injury in mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;119(4):1062–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvad004.
Ma ZG, Yuan YP, Wu HM, Zhang X, Tang QZ. Cardiac fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(12):1645–57. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.28103.
MacKenna DA, Dolfi F, Vuori K, Ruoslahti E. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation by mechanical stretch is integrin-dependent and matrix-specific in rat cardiac fibroblasts. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(2):301–10. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI1026.
Marrouche NF, Wazni O, McGann C, Greene T, Dean JM, Dagher L, et al. Effect of MRI-Guided fibrosis ablation vs conventional catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DECAAF II randomized clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2296–305. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.8831.
Massare J, Berry JM, Luo X, Rob F, Johnstone JL, Shelton JM, et al. Diminished cardiac fibrosis in heart failure is associated with altered ventricular arrhythmia phenotype. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(9):1031–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01736.x.
Mathiasen AB, Qayyum AA, Jorgensen E, Helqvist S, Fischer-Nielsen A, Kofoed KF, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in patients with severe ischaemic heart failure: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (MSC-HF trial). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(27):1744–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv136.
Muraoka N, Nara K, Tamura F, Kojima H, Yamakawa H, Sadahiro T, et al. Role of cyclooxygenase-2-mediated prostaglandin E2-prostaglandin E receptor 4 signaling in cardiac reprogramming. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08626-y.
Miyamoto K, Akiyama M, Tamura F, Isomi M, Yamakawa H, Sadahiro T, et al. Direct In Vivo Reprogramming with Sendai Virus Vectors Improves Cardiac Function after Myocardial Infarction. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(1):91–103 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.010.
Nugraha B, Buono MF, von Boehmer L, Hoerstrup SP, Emmert MY. Human Cardiac Organoids for Disease Modeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1286.
Nunes SS, Miklas JW, Liu J, Aschar-Sobbi R, Xiao Y, Zhang B, et al. Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods. 2013;10(8):781–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2524.
Occhetta P, Isu G, Lemme M, Conficconi C, Oertle P, Raz C, et al. A three-dimensional in vitro dynamic micro-tissue model of cardiac scar formation. Integr Biol (camb). 2018;10(3):174–83. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7IB00199A.
Paik DT, Chandy M, Wu JC. Patient and Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Discovery of Personalized Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapeutics. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72(1):320–42. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.116.013003.
Parrotta EI, Lucchino V, Scaramuzzino L, Scalise S, Cuda G. Modeling Cardiac Disease Mechanisms Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: Progress, Promises and Challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124354.
Polonchuk L, Chabria M, Badi L, Hoflack JC, Figtree G, Davies MJ, et al. Cardiac spheroids as promising in vitro models to study the human heart microenvironment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06385-8.
Pontes Soares C, Midlej V, de Oliveira ME, Benchimol M, Costa ML, Mermelstein C. 2D and 3D-organized cardiac cells shows differences in cellular morphology, adhesion junctions, presence of myofibrils and protein expression. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e38147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038147.
Qian L, Huang Y, Spencer CI, Foley A, Vedantham V, Liu L, et al. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature. 2012;485(7400):593–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11044.
Qu Z, Balkir L, van Deutekom JC, Robbins PD, Pruchnic R, Huard J. Development of approaches to improve cell survival in myoblast transfer therapy. J Cell Biol. 1998;142(5):1257–67. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.142.5.1257.
Querdel E, Reinsch M, Castro L, Kose D, Bahr A, Reich S, et al. human engineered heart tissue patches Remuscularize the injured heart in a dose-dependent manner. Circulation. 2021;143(20):1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047904.
Quijada P, Sussman MA. Making it stick: chasing the optimal stem cells for cardiac regeneration. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;12(11):1275–88. https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2014.972941.
Rahaman SO, Grove LM, Paruchuri S, Southern BD, Abraham S, Niese KA, et al. TRPV4 mediates myofibroblast differentiation and pulmonary fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5225–38. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI75331.
Razeghian-Jahromi I, Matta AG, Canitrot R, Zibaeenezhad MJ, Razmkhah M, Safari A, et al. Surfing the clinical trials of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):361. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02443-1.
Richards DJ, Li Y, Kerr CM, Yao J, Beeson GC, Coyle RC, et al. Human cardiac organoids for the modelling of myocardial infarction and drug cardiotoxicity. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(4):446–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-0539-4.
Rios FJ, Zou ZG, Harvey AP, Harvey KY, Nosalski R, Anyfanti P, et al. Chanzyme TRPM7 protects against cardiovascular inflammation and fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(3):721–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz164.
Rogers AJ, Miller JM, Kannappan R, Sethu P. Cardiac Tissue Chips (CTCs) for Modeling Cardiovascular Disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(12):3436–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2905763.
Sacchi M, Bansal R, Rouwkema J. Bioengineered 3D Models to Recapitulate Tissue Fibrosis. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):623–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.010.
Sahara M. Recent Advances in Generation of In Vitro Cardiac Organoids. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076244.
Savoji H, Mohammadi MH, Rafatian N, Toroghi MK, Wang EY, Zhao Y, et al. Cardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening. Biomaterials. 2019;198:3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.036.
Schaaf S, Shibamiya A, Mewe M, Eder A, Stohr A, Hirt MN, et al. Human engineered heart tissue as a versatile tool in basic research and preclinical toxicology. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e26397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026397.
Shimizu T, Liao JK. Rho Kinases and Cardiac Remodeling. Circ J. 2016;80(7):1491–8. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0433.
Silva GV, Litovsky S, Assad JA, Sousa AL, Martin BJ, Vela D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into an endothelial phenotype, enhance vascular density, and improve heart function in a canine chronic ischemia model. Circulation. 2005;111(2):150–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000151812.86142.45.
Silva AC, Matthys OB, Joy DA, Kauss MA, Natarajan V, Lai MH, et al. Co-emergence of cardiac and gut tissues promotes cardiomyocyte maturation within human iPSC-derived organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(12):2137–52 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.11.007.
Smits AM, van Vliet P, Metz CH, Korfage T, Sluijter JP, Doevendans PA, et al. Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells differentiate into functional mature cardiomyocytes: an in vitro model for studying human cardiac physiology and pathophysiology. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(2):232–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.229.
Song MH, Choi SC, Noh JM, Joo HJ, Park CY, Cha JJ, et al. LEFTY-PITX2 signaling pathway is critical for generation of mature and ventricular cardiac organoids in human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac mesoderm cells. Biomaterials. 2021;278:121133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.
Spinale FG. Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(4):1285–342. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2007.
Sridharan D, Pracha N, Rana SJ, Ahmed S, Dewani AJ, Alvi SB, et al. Preclinical Large Animal Porcine Models for Cardiac Regeneration and Its Clinical Translation: Role of hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Cells. 2023;12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12071090.
Sun X, Nunes SS. Bioengineering Approaches to Mature Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017;5:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00019.
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.
Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019.
Tan SH, Loo SJ, Gao Y, Tao ZH, Su LP, Wang CX, et al. Thymosin beta4 increases cardiac cell proliferation, cell engraftment, and the reparative potency of human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. Theranostics. 2021;11(16):7879–95. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.56757.
Tang XL, Rokosh G, Sanganalmath SK, Yuan F, Sato H, Mu J, et al. Intracoronary administration of cardiac progenitor cells alleviates left ventricular dysfunction in rats with a 30-day-old infarction. Circulation. 2010;121(2):293–305. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.871905.
Tang Y, Aryal S, Geng X, Zhou X, Fast VG, Zhang J, et al. TBX20 Improves Contractility and Mitochondrial Function During Direct Human Cardiac Reprogramming. Circulation. 2022;146(20):1518–36. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059713.
Templin C, Zweigerdt R, Schwanke K, Olmer R, Ghadri JR, Emmert MY, et al. Transplantation and tracking of human-induced pluripotent stem cells in a pig model of myocardial infarction: assessment of cell survival, engraftment, and distribution by hybrid single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography of sodium iodide symporter transgene expression. Circulation. 2012;126(4):430–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.087684.
Thavandiran N, Dubois N, Mikryukov A, Masse S, Beca B, Simmons CA, et al. Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(49):E4698–707. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311120110.
Tulloch NL, Muskheli V, Razumova MV, Korte FS, Regnier M, Hauch KD, et al. Growth of engineered human myocardium with mechanical loading and vascular coculture. Circ Res. 2011;109(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.237206.
Wada R, Muraoka N, Inagawa K, Yamakawa H, Miyamoto K, Sadahiro T, et al. Induction of human cardiomyocyte-like cells from fibroblasts by defined factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(31):12667–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304053110.
Wang J, Chen H, Seth A, McCulloch CA. Mechanical force regulation of myofibroblast differentiation in cardiac fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(5):H1871–81. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00387.2003.
Wang J, Gu S, Liu F, Chen Z, Xu H, Liu Z, et al. Reprogramming of fibroblasts into expandable cardiovascular progenitor cells via small molecules in xeno-free conditions. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(4):403–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00865-7.
Witty AD, Mihic A, Tam RY, Fisher SA, Mikryukov A, Shoichet MS, et al. Generation of the epicardial lineage from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(10):1026–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3002.
Wu Q, Wang J, Tan WLW, Jiang Y, Wang S, Li Q, et al. Extracellular vesicles from human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells promote cardiac infarct healing through reducing cardiomyocyte death and promoting angiogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(5):354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2508-y.
Xiang FL, Fang M, Yutzey KE. Loss of beta-catenin in resident cardiac fibroblasts attenuates fibrosis induced by pressure overload in mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00840-w.
Xie Y, Liu J, Qian L. Direct cardiac reprogramming comes of age: Recent advance and remaining challenges. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;122:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.07.010.
Xu J, Carretero OA, Liao TD, Peng H, Shesely EG, Xu J, et al. Local angiotensin II aggravates cardiac remodeling in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299(5):H1328–38. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00538.2010.
Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526.
Yue Z, Zhang Y, Xie J, Jiang J, Yue L. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and cardiac fibrosis. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(3):270–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026611313030005.
Zhang D, Shadrin IY, Lam J, Xian HQ, Snodgrass HR, Bursac N. Tissue-engineered cardiac patch for advanced functional maturation of human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials. 2013;34(23):5813–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.026.
Zhang L, Jambusaria A, Hong Z, Marsboom G, Toth PT, Herbert BS, et al. SOX17 regulates conversion of human fibroblasts into endothelial cells and erythroblasts by dedifferentiation Into CD34(+) progenitor cells. Circulation. 2017;135(25):2505–23. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025722.
Zhang H, Tian L, Shen M, Tu C, Wu H, Gu M, et al. Generation of Quiescent Cardiac Fibroblasts From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for In Vitro Modeling of Cardiac Fibrosis. Circ Res. 2019;125(5):552–66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315491.
Zhang S, Wan Z, Kamm RD. Vascularized organoids on a chip: strategies for engineering organoids with functional vasculature. Lab Chip. 2021;21(3):473–88. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0LC01186J.
Zhao M, Nakada Y, Wei Y, Bian W, Chu Y, Borovjagin AV, et al. Cyclin D2 Overexpression Enhances the Efficacy of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Myocardial Repair in a Swine Model of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2021;144(3):210–28. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049497.
Zhao M, Wang L, Wang M, Zhou S, Lu Y, Cui H, et al. Targeting fibrosis, mechanisms and cilinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01070-3.
Zhao Y, Rafatian N, Feric NT, Cox BJ, Aschar-Sobbi R, Wang EY, et al. A Platform for Generation of Chamber-Specific Cardiac Tissues and Disease Modeling. Cell. 2019;176(4):913–27 e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.042.
Zhou Y, Liu Z, Welch JD, Gao X, Wang L, Garbutt T, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analyses of Cell Fate Transitions during Human Cardiac Reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(1):149–64 e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.020.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (92057113 and 32122027), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515012489 and 2022A1515011819), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200280), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M713573).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.Z., W.T., Y.W., and H.F. wrote the manuscript. N.C. and X.S. edited and supervised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no completing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, N., Tang, W., Wu, Y. et al. Harnessing stem cell and lineage reprogramming technology to treat cardiac fibrosis. Cell Regen 12, 39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13619-023-00182-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13619-023-00182-7